Custom carrying case containing anthropometry instruments used in Nazi Germany

Identifier
irn3372
Language of Description
English
Alt. Identifiers
  • 1990.272.1
Level of Description
Item
Source
EHRI Partner

Extent and Medium

overall: Height: 14.500 inches (36.83 cm) | Width: 9.750 inches (24.765 cm) | Depth: 0.875 inches (2.223 cm)

Archival History

The case was donated to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in 1990 by the Institut für Humangenetik der Universität Göttingen.

Acquisition

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Collection, Gift of the Institut für Humangenetik der Universität Göttingen

Scope and Content

Carrying case for a set of anthropometry instruments used to measure body parts as part of eugenics studies conducted in Nazi-controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945. Anthropometry is a branch of Anthropology that focuses on how to systematically identify and classify a range of physical characteristics found within different populations of people. This methodological approach was well-suited to the rising emphasis on eugenics, often referred to as racial hygiene, in Germany during the 1920s and 1930s. Many supporters linked eugenics to race, and believed that “race mixing,” modern medicine, keeping the “unfit” alive to reproduce, and costly welfare programs hindered natural selection and would lead to the biological “degeneration” of society. These ideas and practices began to inform government policy, and were absorbed into the ideology and platform of the newly formed Nazi Party during the 1920s. Following Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in January 1933, a politically extreme, antisemitic variation of eugenics shaped Nazi policies and permeated German society and institutions. These policies touted the “Nordic race” as its eugenic ideal, and made efforts to exclude anyone deemed hereditarily “less valuable” or “racially foreign,” including Jews, “Slavs, Roma (gypsies), and blacks.” Racial hygiene studies assigned individuals to state-defined races, ranked from “superior” to “inferior,” based on family genealogies, anthropometric measurements, and intelligence tests. Many German physicians and scientists, who had supported racial hygiene ideas before 1933, embraced the Nazi emphasis on biology and heredity, in order to take advantage of new career opportunities and additional funding for research.

Conditions Governing Access

No restrictions on access

Conditions Governing Reproduction

No restrictions on use

Physical Characteristics and Technical Requirements

Rectangular, flat, olive green, heavyweight canvas carrying case with four flaps covering the cardboard-reinforced body. The stiff, rectangular back panel has a short top flap, and a full-height, rectangular bottom flap. The side flaps are each full-height, half of the width of the case, and covered by the bottom flap when the case is closed. The top and side flaps are rectangular with notched corners. The top flap is fastened by a centered, U-shaped, metal hasp anchored over the bottom edge of a pentagonal leather pull-tab. The corresponding bracket is on an oval-shaped metal plate anchored to the upper portion of the bottom flap. There is a full height pocket on the interior of the bottom flap. On the interior of the back panel are two pairs of two, vertically aligned, short, horizontal leather loops sewn with brown thread. Each pair secures one medical tool (.1.1-.1.2) in the case. Between the two pairs, near the bottom edge, is a horizontal slot pocket formed by a rectangular piece of leather with a curved upper edge. Along the left edge of the case, a larger rectangular leather loop has been sewn down in the center to form two narrow vertical channels for pencils (.1.3-.1.4). The case is stitched with olive green thread, the fittings are silver-colored metal, and the leather is brown and decorated with impressed lines along the edges. There are wear marks from the tools stored within the case, and a white stain on the inner bottom flap.

Subjects

Genre

This description is derived directly from structured data provided to EHRI by a partner institution. This collection holding institution considers this description as an accurate reflection of the archival holdings to which it refers at the moment of data transfer.