[Krogman diary]

Identifier
990004810010304146
Language of Description
English
Dates
1 Jan 1933 - 31 Dec 1950
Languages
  • German
Source
EHRI Partner

Creator(s)

Scope and Content

Excerpts of the diary of C.V. Krogmann from 1933, 1934 and 1936 with an additional notice from 1950. The diary entries describe the work of the mayor of Hamburg in regard to economy and shows his struggel to better foreign sale policies. Foreign sale was a main interest of Hamburg. The entries are about meetings that are about trade and financial policies for Germany and specific projects for Hamburg. Many entries are about consultations and conversations with Keppler, Schlotterer, Posse, Wagener, Luebbert, Syrup a.o.. The provision of work is a main focus. Some entries are about appointments. Several entries are about meetings in the Reichs Chancellery. The diary reveals tensions and disagreements between factions withing the economic leadership and also personal fights e.g. between Schacht and Darre. Meetings of Goering with economists and industrialist reveal Goerings standing. One of the main issues is the question how and how much the state should intervene. Among the entries a speech of Krogmann at the "day of trade" in Braunschweig 1933. A few entries are from the London economic conference. Entry about the meeting of the Generalrat der Wirtschaft. In an addition to the diary entries Krogmann declares in 1950 that he was approached by Keppler and others to bring down Hugenberg. Krogmann also declares that he told Luebbert about his ideas for provision of work which Luebbert forwarded to Hitler.

Conditions Governing Access

Access may be restricted to TAU community via Automatic Proxy

Physical Characteristics and Technical Requirements

Mode of access: WWW

Note(s)

  • Electronic access only

  • Electronic text and image data. Jerusalem : Yad Vashem 2015

  • Title viewed 11.12.17

People

Subjects

This description is derived directly from structured data provided to EHRI by a partner institution. This collection holding institution considers this description as an accurate reflection of the archival holdings to which it refers at the moment of data transfer.